eLatin eGreek eLearn

More wired than a Roman Internet café

Input to the College Board on a Revised AP Latin Exam

I completed the AP Latin survey that the College Board has circulated.. While the move to revision of the AP Vergil course to more of a "survey course" seems in the works, I don't think what seems likely to emerge from AP's efforts will address some concerns that really should be addressed. For what it's worth, I'd like to suggest a change in the structure of the AP Latin exam that, I think, would address some of these concerns.

There are a number of concerns with what AP has done and is doing. But one of the most important is this: many, many schools have elaborated curricula, hired staff, acquired materials, and adopted standards to facilitate a program that has culminated in the two AP Latin courses. The decision to cancel the AP Latin Lit course has made the practical value of significant parts of this investment uncertain. The likely new course will not include all that has been in the two AP Latin courses. It cannot. There's simply too much content. But there may be a way to salvage more than we have thought we could.

The exam for the new capstone AP Latin course will likely be of the same two parts as the present exam: a Multiple Choice section and a Free Response section. The Multiple Choice section, a "Sight Reading" section, has used selections of authors of varied repute from a broad historical span, including authors that many of us have never seen or, in some cases, heard of. The object of this section has been to test the students "raw" Latin language competence, without the limitation of that author's having been included in a canon of "must read" or most-important authors. The Free Response section has used a syllabus of specified text from specified authors. Its object has been to test the "developed" Latin language competence of the student with respect to those authors and that text.

I would like to suggest that this change. Let AP, in concert with the college and el-hi Latin community, produce a new author list, an "A" list. Let's say that list ends up as Vergil, Catullus, and Cicero, or Vergil, Catullus, Cicero and Ovid, or even Virgil, Catullus, Cicero, Ovid, and Horace. The Free Response section could test these authors and their shortened lists of specified texts much as they have done.

But how about doing the Multiple Choice section differently? Instead of using authors/selections that are on no list of readings and that if is highly likely the students have not seen, no matter how ambitious their program and course have been, why not work from a further fuller list of Latin authors and texts, a "B" list, that the Sight Readings can be drawn from. The list would be extensive enough so that it is still likely that the student will not have seen all or most of the readings. But the list would include authors and texts from the Latin Literature sequences and so restore practical significance to much of what we have been doing in our courses leading up to the AP Latin courses. For those who want to revise and renew AP Latin even more aggressively, it would be very easy to add authors and texts to this list, including Livy and Caesar and perhaps others such as, e.g., Plautus or Terence or Lucretius or Sallust or Martial or Petronius.

I offer this because I do think we need to work to minimize any significant damage that the change in AP Latin may bring.

Dan O'Shea
Ursuline Academy of Dallas, Texas Delete Comment

Views: 44

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Where was this survey? I teach AP Latin, and never received it. Is there a link somewhere?

Irina Greenman
Hayfield Secondary School
Latin teacher
Sponsor, Latin Club

RSS

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Andrew Reinhard.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service